Paul Reiman and Kathryn Gombos recently went head-to-head to tackle both sides of a debate on key annual cycle decisions. It was a fast-moving, lively debate covering arguments for and against design elements that every compensation team must address. Participants decided live who would argue for which side on topics like differentiated vs. flat increases, combined vs. separate comp and performance conversations, and more. You won’t want to miss this showdown replay!
.jpg){kind=spacer}